Re: Reverting the kernel 32/64bit compensation code in autofs userspace?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 18:04 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 08:57 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 22:47 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > > Now when kernel has more or less nice interface which works
> > > with all variants of userspace to date, maybe it's time to
> > > revert the commit which enables different struct size for
> > > kernels > 3.3, especially since that commit was initially
> > > wrong (since it does not take into account any stable trees
> > > and possible backports to other previous versions)?
> > 
> > We will need to use something similar to the patch I already sent you as
> > kernel releases don't get unreleased so I will need to cater for it.
> 
> Well, how do you like that, it turns out that somehow the patch got on
> my list of completed patches but was not actually committed to git ...
> I'll need to check there aren't more ...

Oh, my mistake, ignore that, I'm just confused.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Ext4]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux