Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce a version6 of autofs interface, to fix design error.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> BTW, I want to clarify that my position is that userland might have
> been the best place to handle this rather than the kernel.

It definitely is not.

You are ignoring the fact that the user-land workaround resulted in an
independent bug in *another* user-land project.

Your whole argument was apparently that "that point in user-land is
the only place that knows the details". But that argument is bogus
crap - and we can *see* that it is bogus crap by the fact that there
was *another* user-land place that had this problem, but didn't
realize it.

That's why fixing it in user land was always wrong. There isn't just a
single user of this interface!

Btw, I think I may have an alternate fix. Which is to simply add a
"packetized" mode to pipes.

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Ext4]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux