Re: QCA6174, is it ath6kl or ath10k?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yan Bellavance <ybellavance@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thanks for prompt reply.  Frankly, I'm still trying to figure what
> driver we have really.  It's called qcaqcld2.0 but I see references to
> ath6kl in the various folders relating to the wifi. So that is why I
> presumed it was based on a ath6kl driver. What exactly is the
> qcaqcld2.0 driver?

That's the vendor driver. In these lists we don't give any support to
that, we only support upstream drivers like ath10k.

> I know support for ath10k starts with kernel 4.0 and we have kernel
> 3.10 but I don't see anything that would tell me that a backport has
> been applied. And we've been having some issues so that is how I got
> here.

You can always use backports project to get latest ath10k to an older
kernel.

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k/backports

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath6kl mailing list
ath6kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath6kl



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux WPAN]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux