I do realize that this chipset is now, very probably, 'obsolete' , but it did work once. Regression ignored is surely satanism?
:-)
Regards
David
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Ian Stakenvicius, Aerobiology Research <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 21/11/12 04:08 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 9:19 AM, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
>>> No, dm goes by hard sector sizes, not pretended ones.
>
> What do you mean? dm devices are virtual so there is no "hard" sector
> size; it's all virtual. Are you saying it is hard coded to report 512
> bytes and can't be changed?
I'm guessing that what Heinz means is that dmraid reads superblocks or
whatever in accordance with the sector size on the hardware itself
("hard" = hardware level); since it does this in order to feed the
correct setup info to device-mapper it would not be acting on virtual
devices..
Just my interpretation though, please correct me if i'm wrong.
_______________________________________________
Ataraid-list mailing list
Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
_______________________________________________ Ataraid-list mailing list Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
