On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:52:14PM -0700, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
> I think that the array for nested raid levels, in metadata.c, may be
> upside down. When I build a raid0+1 with Intel or Nvidia (one mirror
> array of two stripe arrays), it is reported as a "raid10" with [dmraid
> -s], this should be "raid01". If I reverse the nesting to raid10, in
> Intel (one stripe array of two mirror arrays), it is reported as a
> "raid01" with [dmraid -s], this should be "raid10".
>
> Can we just reverse the array in metadata.c?
Nope, this is a question of the definition of RAID10 and RAID01 (or RAID0+1).
I use RAID10 for a mirror on top of 2 (or more) striped sets vs.
RAID01 for a stripe on top of 2 (or more) mirror sets in dmraid.
Ie. looking at the device stack from the top to the bottom.
So the example you made above (Intel or NVidia) with one mirror of
2 striped arrays is a RAID10 by that definition.
Heinz
>
> From:
> static const char *stacked_ascii_type[][5] = {
> { "raid10", "raid30", "raid40", "raid50", "raid60" },
> { "raid01", "raid03", "raid04", "raid05", "raid06" },
> };
>
> To:
> static const char *stacked_ascii_type[][5] = {
> { "raid01", "raid03", "raid04", "raid05", "raid06" },
> { "raid10", "raid30", "raid40", "raid50", "raid60" },
>
> };
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
_______________________________________________
Ataraid-list mailing list
Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
