Hi Molle, Huh, oh, no no, I was refering to the system I had been working on being done with 3.x. Sorry I didn't make myself clearer. My bad. Thanks loads, Paul --- Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Paul Moore wrote: > > Thanks, that answered a lot of questions. I noted that it had the same > > windows 95A type MBR as the system I was looking at. Unfortunately I didn't > > get what OS it was partitioned with. > > Windows NT 4.0 Server. Blank disk. > MBR created + disk partitioned using the NT4 Disk Administrator tool. > Take a look at the screenshots, it's all there. > > > it was NT-3.x with 256 byte sector partitioning. Any ideas? This is > > probably a semi-fluke (?). It might still be a good idea to add a parameter > > to dmraid that says, if you can't get this to work and all your > > partitioning was done with some ancient windows OS, try this. > > There's got to be a more intelligent way of doing this. > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
