Hi, without T.38 gateway. On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming at digium.com>wrote: > On 04/22/2012 10:17 AM, Gregory Massel wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Is anyone using libss7 on Asterisk 10 with T.38 gateway (or without >> using T.38)? >> >> I've got two boxes on Asterisk 1.8 with libss7 (in addition to a few >> with Ast 1.8 and chan_ss7) that are pretty stable and was just wondering >> whether it's worth upgrading the libss7 boxes to Asterisk 10, what >> stability is like, whether T.38 plays nicely with libss7, etc? >> > > SS7 and T.38 are completely unrelated. The T.38 gateway features of > Asterisk 10 work on *any* bearer channel that can transport G.711 audio > reliably, regardless of what signaling method is used to manage that > channel. > > -- > Kevin P. Fleming > Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies > Jabber: kfleming at digium.com | SIP: kpfleming at digium.com | Skype: kpfleming > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org > > -- > ______________________________**______________________________**_________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-ss7 mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7> > -- BIPIN RAGHUVANSHI OPERATION HEAD ASTERISK (DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH) WWW.EHORIZONS.IN 011-32323262 011-46334633 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20120424/728223ae/attachment.htm>
|