Poor dahdi_test results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



send us a dahdi_hardware output.

I had this problem on a server with poor IRQ handling. Both my cards were
sharing the same IRQ numbers. It boiled down to running a single card on
that server.

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Ryan Crowder
<ryanc at customteleconnect.com>wrote:

>  A little off topic so if you know a better list please let me know.****
>
> ** **
>
> I am getting bad dahdi_test results and I assume ss7 will fail or have
> problems.  I disabled everything (NIC2 and USB) that was sharing an IRQ so
> the cards ( 1 digium, 1 rhino) each have their own.****
>
> But I still get bad results.****
>
> ** **
>
> Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy...****
>
> 99.504% 99.368% 99.563% 99.661% 99.462% 99.563% 99.364% 99.564%****
>
> 99.660% 99.462% 99.661% 99.461% 99.562% 99.661% 99.462% 99.661%****
>
> 99.462% 99.660% 99.564% 99.362% 99.561% 99.462% 99.660% 99.563%****
>
> 99.364% 99.563% 99.364% 99.564% 99.661% 99.364% 99.563% 99.364%****
>
> 99.562% 99.563% 99.364% 99.672% 99.570% 99.661% 99.661% 99.366%****
>
> 99.566% 99.560% 99.757% 99.563% 99.363% 99.563% 99.461% 99.661%****
>
> 99.564% 99.365% 99.563% 99.362% 99.561% 99.563% 99.364% 99.564%****
>
> 99.732% 99.533% 99.661% 99.461% 99.661% 99.462% 99.563% 99.661%****
>
> 99.462% 99.661% 99.461% 99.661% 99.683% 99.582% 99.661% 99.462%****
>
> 99.661% 99.563% 99.364% 99.564% 99.364% 99.564% 99.661% 99.364%****
>
> 99.564% 99.366% 99.563% 99.661% 99.559% 99.661% 99.364% 99.563%****
>
> 99.661% 99.462% 99.661% 99.462% 99.660% 99.563% 99.461% 99.661%****
>
> 99.463% 99.661% 99.563% 99.364% 99.563% 99.462% 99.661% 99.564%****
>
> 99.363% 99.562% ^C****
>
> --- Results after 106 passes ---****
>
> Best: 99.757 -- Worst: 99.362 -- Average: 99.539151, Difference: 99.993128
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> What else can I check?****
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments
> are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ?? 2510-2521. The
> information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and
> protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113
> U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other legal
> privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any purpose other
> than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited, and may
> subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY ALL
> COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> transmittal.
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-ss7 mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7
>



-- 
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20110919/8c436bf5/attachment.htm>


[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Asterisk Books]

  Powered by Linux