Hi, I am on 1.6.1.20. I've changed to fixed (could not find actual keyword static), with a size of 160ms, ie double the default write buffer, and so far, the quality seems fine. I'll let know the list if the write buffer issue improves, Regards, J. On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:00 AM, marek cervenka <cervajs at fpf.slu.cz> wrote: > Hello all chan_ss7 users >> >> I am facing this issue as well, using chan_ss7 1.4.3 and dahdi complete >> 2.3.0 >> >> There seems to be a consensus to set the jitter buffer max size to 1000ms >> - I am concerned as will this induce a 1 sec delay ? Or will the >> adaptative mode allow to optimize this ? >> >> Is anyone using this parameters in production ? What feedback can you give >> ? >> >> I am a bit cautious as this is happening in prod (not test), and dont want >> to scr*w things up ! >> > > i'm using jbimpl = static because i had problems with adaptive on asterisk > 1.6.2.x > > -- > --------------------------------------- > Marek Cervenka > ======================================= > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-ss7 mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20110209/b8c63c47/attachment.htm>
|