ANM without ACM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is not legal to send an ANM without ACM. You can send a CON instead of ANM.
Try to put a Proceeding() in the dial plan.


Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Horacio J. Pe?a <horape@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 20:03:43 
To: <asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com>
Subject: ANM without ACM

Hola!

I'm playing with libss7 and found that if I make a dialplan like:

exten => 08231451010,1,Answer
...

the result is:

105  12.024960         2146 -> 639          ISUP(ITU) IAM (CIC 2)
107  12.028962          639 -> 2146         ISUP(ITU) ANM (CIC 2)
109  12.065962         2146 -> 639          ISUP(ITU) RSC (CIC 2)
111  12.068958          639 -> 2146         ISUP(ITU) RLC (CIC 2)
113  12.103963         2146 -> 639          ISUP(ITU) RSC (CIC 54)

It seems that the switch I'm connecting to doesn't accept ANM without a
previous ACM. Who is wrong? asterisk (libss7) sending ANM directly or
the other switch not allowing that?

Thanks!
-- 
Horacio J. Pe?a
horape at compendium.com.ar
horape at uninet.edu

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-ss7 mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7


[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Asterisk Books]

  Powered by Linux