No worries. I only spent a few hours on that SLC thing. ;) I've checked the switch, all looks the same as you've posted. I turned on isupMsgTrace this morning, but haven't logged into the LTC to look at it yet (had too much else to do today and will have to look first thing in the morning). I do appreciate your help thus far. Luckily this list isn't horribly busy... -- Bryan On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Paul Timmins wrote: > > 1.6.1.10 > > As far as signaling, I created another switch in my local network > (fLocal = LOCAL) and the settings on my SS7 node are as follows: > fAdjacent YES > nodeType REMOTE_NODE > fTransferCapability NO > L3T25_period 30000ms > L3T28_period 3000ms > L3T29_period 60000ms > allowExtraRoutesForAlias OFF > > I know some of those settings can cause weirdness, most of them are > grayed out so if yours differ, you'll have to recreate the node. > > My f-link is indeed SLC 0, apolgies for implying otherwise, btw. > > Bryan Scott wrote: > I've moved the f-link to the last channel (48), but otherwise yes, it > looks like my other SS7 links and trunk groups. When I query the > circuit range, I get a message on Asterisk saying something about a > message on non-equipped CICs (CQM I think). I'll get more details in > a little bit (on the iPad now, not at my laptop). > > When I run ss7 unblock cic x xx I don't see any debug messages that > would indicate Asterisk is sending anything. Are you on 1.6? >
|