Hi, I tried today now the latest you have on: https://observer.router.hu/repos_pub/libss7/sio_sios The statement of the provdier which is pretty positive / OK (THANKS!): "It is OK now, periodical SIO/SIOS is present.(Just one non important note: only in case it is simple for You, you could decrease the time between SIOS and SIO; you have set the same value as Timer2, i.e. also 50seconds; normally SIO follows SIOS almost immediately, something between 1 and 2 seconds; so interval SIO/SIOS=50sec (i.e.timer2), interval SIOS/SIO 1-2sec." The last "huge" problem I have now is the deactivation of a link via command: Povider: "What is still necessary to manage, is to be able to deactivate the link." Any idea how to solve that with libss7? Regards, Erik Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2009, 16:27 +0100 schrieb Attila Domjan: > try now please! > > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:09 +0100, Erik Wartusch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is the answer I got from 02 czech telecom regarding the test I > > asked them using your latest code > > (https://observer.router.hu/repos_pub/libss7/sio_sios). > > Not successful from their side of view: > > > > "In "wimi" enclosure there is the correct example of existing signalling > > L2 behavior in case, when link is deactivated on the other side,how > > switch(TPR1) should correctly send sequence SIO/SIOS - i.e. periodical > > sending SIO, followed ba SIOS > > (In fact, SIOS between two SIO attempts is sent very frequently but due > > to lucidity just the very first SIOS after each SIO is shown by > > monitoring machine) > > In "wimi1" is shown, how your system react. It is better than before, > > because SIOS is already present, but periodical sequence SIO/SIOS is > > still missing." > > > > Regards, > > > > Erik
|