Hi, I think its the best solution because handling complexity of distributed MTP3 (specially network part) is a mess, even giant class 4/5 switch makers hadn't done it. Mathew, by "like they do with a real MTP2 link, except it's just over an IP based protocol" you mean M2UA or you have your own protocol? Regards. -- M. Shokuie Nia 2009/1/14 Matthew Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> > Mehdi Shirazi wrote: > >>> Although I am not using true M3UA and sigtran protocols right now, > >>> conceptually, this is almost exactly what we are doing, except we will > >>> support multiple SGs to each ASP as well. > > > >>> Matthew Fredrickson > >>> Digium, Inc. > > > > For multiple SGs to each ASP support am I correct : > > "with M3UA we need one point code for each SG but with M2UA we need only > one point code (assigned in ASP ?) and it seems implementing M2UA is easier > than M3UA" (leaving MTP3 and ISUP part unchanged) > > Like I said, this is basically what I'm doing. The way the links look > to the MTP3 on each box is exactly like they do with a real MTP2 link, > except it's just over an IP based protocol. > > Matthew Fredrickson > Digium, Inc. > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-ss7 mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20090114/9e28c217/attachment-0001.htm
|