Hi, thanks, today I have an interconnection (Lucent switch) and seems everything ok, only need implement generic notification indication in CPG (the switch use it instead of SUS/RES), I fixed the mtp3 restart missimplementation. We will have another interconnection, the another telco has STPs the current not, so the STP related stuff not tested yet with switch (inhibit, TFP). I will do some more tests tomorrow and I think after it should merging the patches. Regards, Attila On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 11:42 +0500, Anton wrote: > Hey Domjan, > > Your patches great, I'm already using them on one of my live > servers. I've noticed one issue with them in the tests, but > it's not too critical. > > Regards, > Anton. > > On Tuesday 18 November 2008 01:32, Domjan Attila wrote: > > Hi, > > I hope tomorrow will be fixed my leased lines and this > > week we will finish the interconnection tests and you can > > inspect my patches. > > > > Rgards, > > Attila > > > > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:02 -0600, Matthew Fredrickson > wrote: > > > Tobias Wolf wrote: > > > > Matthew Fredrickson schrieb: > > > >> Kristian Nielsen wrote: > > > >>> Tobias Wolf <tobias.wolf at evision.de> writes: > > > >>> > > > >>> I believe you can do this with chan_ss7, setting up > > > >>> two boxes as a cluster, though I think you would > > > >>> set up both boxes with the same point code. This is > > > >>> important not only to get load sharing but also to > > > >>> be able to do system maintenance without downtime, > > > >>> and is a standard in the MPT3 part of SS7. > > > > > > > > I have not checked chan_ss7 yet, because libss7 works > > > > very well for us. but maybe it is worth a look ;) > > > > > > > >> That is correct. At this time, we don't have the > > > >> ability to share a single point code between > > > >> multiple machines. > > > >> > > > >>> possible to do it using two different point codes > > > >>> as you describe with some help from the switch at > > > >>> the other end? > > > >> > > > >> That's the way I would advise doing it for the time > > > >> being... > > > > > > > > I have checked with the owner of the ss7 switch and > > > > it supports this. > > > > > > > > any idea when sharing a point code between two (or > > > > more?) asterisk server will be possible. is this on > > > > any roadmap, yet ? > > > > > > Besides getting everything ready so that we pass all > > > interconnection tests, it is the next highest priority. > > > > > > Matthew Fredrickson > > > Digium, Inc. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by > > > http://www.api-digital.com-- > > > > > > asterisk-ss7 mailing list > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20081120/29edc01d/attachment.pgp
|