The current version does not yet support USSD, this will in the future version. Our MAP stack implementation does not yet have USSD PDUs. Best regards, -- Anders Baekgaard Managing Director, Dicea ApS Esromgade 15, 1110 DK-2200 Copenhagen N Denmark Tel: +45 46931411 Fax: +45 46931466 Mobile: +45 20771844 On Sunday 09 November 2008, Suhaib Mehyar wrote: > hi all, > > > can we differ between normal SMS and USSD SMS, does MAP protocol sends USSD > message or such a normal message??? > > > thanks in advance. > > From: ab at dicea.dkTo: anton.vazir at gmail.comDate: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:35:53 > +0100CC: asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.comSubject: Re: [asterisk-ss7] SMS,MMS, > SS7 and wrong approach to > > > Hello Anton, > > You write that chan_ss7 is intentionally filled with bugs, and you mention one bug, about the one way audio problem, that you have reported to this mailling list. In a mail to this list, dated 2008-09-15, you write: > > I have to note that a while ago one edge of the problem was > > in IAX connections between systems - so IAX was giving > > oneway for a certin amount of calls - and switching to SIP > > resoved it - but now it might be just chan_ss7 related. > > If both IAX and chan_ss7 gives one way audio, the problem could be > somewhere else. I do not understand why you think this is a bug > _intentionally_ left in chan_ss7. > > You write that we have not included the patch published on this list for > support of zaptel new style addressing. But there has been support for this > since version 1.0.0, released november 2007. I am not aware of any problem > with this, and I am not aware of any patches that solve bugs that are not > already fixed in the released versions of chan_ss7. I do not understand why > you think that the patch is _intentionally_ left out. > > Your accusation that we intentionally leave bugs and charge people > excessive amount of money to fix them, is simply not true. I receive very > few real bug reports, and I do not see many bug reports on this mailing > list. chan_ss7 is stable and used in production by really many users around > the world. > > In december 2007 I had email correspondance with you where you asks for > help to setup an 8 E1 server. I send you an offer with my best estimates at > that time (2-4 hours for code changes, optionally 5-8 hours if you wants us > to log in to your system and install/configure/test the solution, 170 > Euro/hour). This is considerably more work than changing two lines of code. > I do not understand why you write that we charge you 2000 Euro for two > lines of code. > > You write that Dicea is breaking existing licenses. We obviously will not > do anything not legal, or not comply with existing licenses. chan_ss7 comes > with GPL license, and the supported version comes with the same license. > The purpose of offering a supported version is to provide professional > support for the users that want it, and to finance Diceas continued > development of chan_ss7. The work we do on chan_ss7 is mainly due to > personal interest, but we want to have the work partly financed. > > The mail you sent to this mailing list is your response to somebody > noting that Dicea has an SMS solution. We sell support and SS7 related > software products, this also helps finance the effort put into > chan_ss7. As a user, you are also benefitting from this business model. > > I have maintained chan_ss7 for several years, and I have got a lot of > positive feed back from users. There are a few exceptions like you. > > I hope this mail clears the issues raised. > > Best regards, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20081109/77125a9b/attachment-0001.htm
|