Hi, you can check here: http://asterisk.hosting.lv/ BR, --> Your next partner ! > Look for an IPP version than. > > On Thursday 07 August 2008 11:21, olivier taylor wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I have two servers installed with the latest SS7 >> rellease (asterisk 1.6.0 and chan_dahdi). >> >> It works perfectly, thanks to the list. >> But now, I need to install G729 on these servers but >> digium claim that they does not provide binaries nor >> support G729 on asterisk 1.6 >> >> Any idea is welcome, >> >> Regards, >> Olivier >> >> >> Patrick a ?crit : >> Kristian Nielsen wrote: >> >> Low Yu Siang <yusiang at yahoo.com> writes: >> >> >> After running for days(~300 incoming calls), the link >> became unstable. Whenever a call is coming in, it throws >> the following error messages. This call is accepted >> properly but all other calls cant be accepted during this >> moment(since the signalling link is already down), until >> the link automatically comes up again. >> >> [Aug 6 11:07:43] NOTICE[25980]: mtp.c:1800 >> mtp_thread_main: Empty Zaptel output buffer detected, >> outgoing packets may have been lost on link 'l1'. [Aug 6 >> 11:07:43] NOTICE[25980]: mtp.c:1748 mtp_thread_main: Full >> Zaptel input buffer detected, incoming packets may have >> been lost on link 'l1' (count=64. [Aug 6 11:07:43] >> NOTICE[25980]: mtp.c:1015 mtp2_process_lssu: Got status >> indication 'OS' while INSERVICE on link 'l1'. [Aug 6 >> 11:07:43] WARNING[25980]: chan_ss7.c:622 process_event: >> MTP is now DOWN on link 'l1'. >> >> This could be caused by a delay in the OS scheduling of >> Asterisk, ie. that for too long time, the chan_ss7 code >> did not get a chance to run due to other activity on the >> box. MTP has realtime constraints, so this can cause the >> link to drop. >> >> Are you running Asterisk on real-time priority (I think >> this happens automatically if you start Asterisk as >> root)? >> >> >> Afaik you need to start asterisk with -p to run it as a >> pseudo realtime thread. See asterisk -h >> >> You might also want to check if processes like anacron >> and crond don't eat too much power/io. Updatedb causes >> disk io which could interfere with Asterisk. And perhaps >> others started by crond like makewhatis as well. >> >> Might also be worth investigating if updating to CentOS >> 5.2 gives you a kernel that has more granular timing >> compared to the one you are running right now. >> >> Maybe this one is totally not related to your problem but >> it is also recommended to run a (caching) nameserver in >> your Asterisk box. There was something with Asterisk >> blocking if it could not resolve a name. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> Regards, >> Patrick >> >> _______________________________________________ >> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by >> http://www.api-digital.com-- >> >> asterisk-ss7 mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7 >> > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-ss7 mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7