Thanks for your response.
>> 1. Was this the desired design? If this is the case I believe that it
>> would be better to write this limitation on the ARIdocumentation.
>
> It was intentional, but can be revisited.
>
> It was intentional, but can be revisited.
What procedure should I follow for the revision of this problem? Should I open a new issue/bug? Will you transmit the problem further?
All the best,
Claudiu
_______________________________________________ asterisk-app-dev mailing list asterisk-app-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.digium.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-app-dev
