On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Ben Langfeld <ben at langfeld.me> wrote: > Thanks for starting this discussion here Matt. > > I would be satisfied by either of the two main proposed solutions. > > My implementation of a FreeSWITCH Inbound-Event-Socket app goes for the > "specify channel ID" approach. In this case I can just create a UUID myself. > This one get my vote, plus we can just see how FreeSWITCH does it, trolo. :) > I would be fine with requesting allocating of a UUID from Asterisk, but I'm > not sure how this is really different from pre-allocating a "proto-channel". > > Anything that doesn't ensure that I have the channel's uniqueid before I > request origination is not a solution and means that I have to go > single-threaded to guarantee correctness. We currently do this in Adhearsion > and it hurts performance horribly. > What does your code look like to to day for AMI async originate? Can you share something that compares Asterisk to FreeSWITCH in that aspect. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belanger at polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger
