On Dec 4, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com> wrote: > Another option would be to allow the user to specify the unique id of the channel. This seems a bit frightening, but might be worth pursuing. > > > This is the other option that actually feels like a solution. The danger there is that logic internal to Asterisk relies on the fact that the unique ID of a channel is the system name (if specified) + the timestamp. Not following that schema will break linkedid propagation through bridges. Allowing users to specify it means they would have follow that schema to some extent, which means it probably isn't an option. Crud; I forgot about that. Most unfortunate. -- David M. Lee Digium, Inc. | Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-app-dev/attachments/20131205/833eaadb/attachment.html>
