On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:39 AM, Jared Smith <jaredsmith at jaredsmith.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Paul Belanger <paul.belanger at polybeacon.com> wrote: > In fact, I strongly think we should be hosting our own content, simply > because we can control it and it is the friendly thing to do. Pushing > all our users to [3] doesn't appear to be too friendly, plus just > imagine all the asterisk themeing that could be done to it. > > > Actually, the URL you link to is just a demo system of Swagger-UI. It's just HTML, CSS, and Javascript. Personally, I just put it in the "static" folder of the Asterisk HTTP system and serve it up locally. It's dreadfully simple. I had in my head that the Asterisk HTTP server wouldn't serve up subdirectories in the static-http directory. Actually what my problem I had was the Makefile script would fail on the subdirectories. I really don't want to bundle swagger-ui into the Asterisk source, for the obvious reasons. Adding a contrib script to do that for you, however? https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2924/ -- David M. Lee Digium, Inc. | Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-app-dev/attachments/20131017/4382bf96/attachment-0001.html>
