Hi,
AFAIR this (snd-ruby...) was the way it was handled in debian distros
when I still was on debian. It might be that on debian you had to
symlink snd to snd-scheme, but my memories are blurred.
I'd appreciate, if snd would stay in sync with the scheme default but
it's not a big deal.
--
Orm
Am Samstag, den 10. Juli 2021 um 07:15:27 Uhr (+0000) schrieb Kenneth Flak via arch-proaudio:
> Hi list,
>
> I've recently started working with the snd editor (the audacity debacle gave me that last push...), and I was just wondering what the rationale is for shipping snd with ruby support, instead of the default scheme? Would it be an idea to keep the snd package in community with the scheme default, and instead create a snd-{ruby,forth} package in aur instead for those that use those?
>
> Best,
> Kenneth
>
> --
> Roosna & Flak - Contemporary Dance & Music
> Web: roosnaflak.com
> Code: {github,gitlab}.com/kflak
> Mastodon: @kf@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
