Am 08.08.20 um 14:04 schrieb David Runge: > Hey all, > > here are some changes to the [community] repository (and the > pro-audio group in particular) since June last year (holy cow, time > flies!). > > Added packages: > * fluajho > * patroneo > * gxplugins.lv2 > * adlplug > * bslizr > * ebumeter > * pd-gem > * haskell-tidalcycles > * wolf-spectrum > * zita-dc1 > * foxdot > * geonkick > * qmidinet > * deteriorate-lv2A > * mephisto.lv2 > * vico > * surge > * xmonk.lv2 > * adljack > * bsequencer > * bshapr > * jack-stdio > * jack_delay > * jackmeter > * jackminimix > * ninjas2 > * element > * iempluginsuite > * midimsg-lv2 > * surge > * xmonk.lv2 > * liquidsfz > * sfizz > * ambix > * bchoppr > * helm-synth (replaces helm due to naming conflict with the kubernetes tool) > * jack_utils > * ir.lv2 > * jack_mixer > * new-session-manager > * agordejo > * muse > * distrho-ports > > These are the more or less top-level additions (some of them dragged in > interesting makedepends or checkdepends such as redkite, abletonlink or > lv2lint). There have also been a few removals, such as raul (more or > less defunct and unused) and non-session-manager (replaced by > new-session-manager). > > The vst3-plugins package group has been added for packages that provide > vst3-plugins (I still need to bring the SDK to the repos for hosts to > make use of it...). > > You can inspect the various audio related groups with pacman: > > pacman -Sg pro-audio > pacman -Sg lv2-plugins > pacman -Sg vst-plugins > pacman -Sg vst3-plugins > > Unrelated: Many of the lv2 plugin packages are now being linted using > lv2lint (and problems being reported upstream) which hopefully improves > the overall quality of the plugins over time. > > If you have further suggestions for package additions, please let me > know! > > Since my last mail in regards to package updates I have not done too > many changes on audio related wiki pages (due to time spent on more > infrastructure related topics in regards to Arch Linux). I would like to > encourage you to be active members of the Arch Wiki as I think that > especially the pro-audio related articles leave much to be desired. > > Also, if you would like to package (pro-audio) packages for Arch Linux > do get in touch (e.g. for a Trusted User sponsorship)! I realize that at > around 500 packages it gets a little tedious... :> > > Best, > David >
