Re: Periodic aged package report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 24/10/09 09:06AM, Genes Lists wrote:
> Periodic check of Arch out of date packages. This considered are purely
> my opinion of those that are sufficiently 'relevant'. Apologies to any
> others.
> 
> The really good news is that there really aren't many !
> Big congrats for the hard work keeping Arch awesome and up to date.
> 
> Note that, some are excluded when they are work in progress and/or
> involve a significant amount of work (provided they are not "too" old,
> which none are).
> 
> Arch is doing an amazing job keeping our core/key packages like
> compiler tools, python, systemd, kernel and other vital packages very
> up to date.

Thanks for the kind words here! Also note that what sometimes gets
forgotten is that Arch Packaging is done solely by volunteers who spend
their free time keeping the distribution rolling! IMO this both shows
the awesome effort to make this happen but also should remind us that
sometimes pepoles lifes gets busy and they can't really be blamed for
not following a contract or similar :D

> What remains are a few that are relevant enough (imho) to make the
> list. 
> 
> I am using 3 metrics of age:
> 
>    - Num-B
>      The number of releases we are behind
>      Some packages have frequent updates some do not.
> 
>    - Age 
>      The number of days between the arch version and the latest
> 
>    - New: 
>      How recent was the latest released (days ago from today)
> 
> 
> Package             Arch        Curr    Date      num-b  Age    New
> ------------------  ----------  ------  -------- ------ ------ ----   
> apparmor            3.1.7-5     4.0.3   08/15/24    4    195     55  
> biber               1:2.19-4    2.20    03/21/24    1    321    202 
> dkms                3.0.12-1    3.1.0   10/01/24    2    373      8   

"dkms" is currently being looked into 🤗

> python-cryptography 42.0.8-1    43.0.1  09/03/24    2     91     36   
> python-setuptools   1:69.5.1-1  75.1.0  09/13/24    22   153     26  

As far as I understand this will also need fixing soon once we start
upgrading to python 3.13. There is an outstanding MR which does most of
the work and is currently reviewed:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/python-setuptools/-/merge_requests/1

> yubioath-desktop    5.1.0-3     7.1.0   09/25/24    12  1234     14 (1)
> (1) Now called yubico-authenticator

I'm not sure if this will be properly fixed, so maybe the package will
need to leave the repos. It currently lacks a Maintainer and the flutter
rewrite is not fun to package as soon as you go the non-easy route that
is just repackaging the binary (which is not up to our standards).

I tried to get started with flutter packaging a while back but it seems
like the upstream developers are not prioritizing getting flutter
properly distributable for packaging purposes:

https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129143

--

This is also maybe a good chance to point out that everybody can get
involved and there are many areas that could need some help:

- https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Getting_involved
- https://whatcanidofor.archlinux.org/

> -- 
> Gene

Cheers,
Chris / gromit

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux