Re: Update to pacman 7.0.0 and AUR Helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 10.09.24 20:27, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 19:32 +0200, Moabeat wrote:
core-testing
PPS: Huh?! If you rely on a testing repository and use an AUR helper,
you shouldn't even just send a request ;).

Hi,

I think there is nothing wrong using an AUR helper and, at the same time, contributing to Archlinux in testing packages from the testing repositories. Actually, I was under the impression I am sharing a result of my test in my initial mail, pointing out, that the update of pacman would break compatibility with an existing yay binary and, potentially, also with other AUR helpers.

As already stated, I was able to get this fixed by myself in just rebuilding yay and now it works fine, linked against libalpm.so.15. Thank you for all your hints and insights, but the initial mail was merely intended as a heads-up that less experienced users could use some (if possible, easier) guidance how to overcome this issue when the pacman update hits the main repositories.

Kind regards,
Moabeat




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux