On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 07:21:29 -0600 2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I know that pete said that the question marks in the original post are > artifacts, but I'm still hung up on the fact that in that original post, > the filenames appear to be relative rather than absolute, as if some > environment variable is unset, or perhaps mistakenly set to an empty > string instead of being unset. > > I admit that I haven't read every post in excruciating detail, but if > something in pete's system is looking in usr/lib, but all the people > helping are looking in /usr/lib, that might explain some of the > apparently contradictory results. > > Can pete please verify that the warnings name files in /usr/lib/... (an > absolute path) and not usr/lib/... (a relative path)? Or perhaps > capture the output from commands that generate the warnnings in a file > and post/attach that instead of (presubably) copying and pasing from a > terminal program (which is evidently not a lossless copy)? relatives paths are perfectly normal here. That's how pacman works.
