Re: [arch-announce] Switch to the base-devel meta package requires manual intervention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:09:08 -0500
David Rosenstrauch <darose@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2/15/23 10:06 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:02:48 -0500
> > David Rosenstrauch <darose@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 2/14/23 8:59 PM, Polarian wrote:  
> >>> I do not want sudo on my system  
> >>
> >>
> >> IIRC, it is expected that Arch users have the base and base-devel
> >> packages (and all their dependencies) installed.  So by not doing that,
> >> you're likely setting up your system in an unsupported configuration,
> >> and will wind up having to deal with some weird and difficult to
> >> diagnose problems down the road as a result.
> >>
> >> DR  
> > 
> > No, there is no expectation to have base-devel installed. It's expected for
> > building packages, that's it.  
> 
> OK.  But probably like 90+% of Arch users build packages, no?
> 
> DR

On that specific system? Without using a chroot/container? All official
packages are built in a clean chroot/container, which means there's no need for
base-devel on the host system. Either way, not having base-devel is most
definitely NOT an unsupported configuration.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux