On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 03:23 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 01:29 +0000, Polarian wrote:
> > On 14/01/2023 21:29, Michal S. wrote:
> > > Obfuscation of E-Mails can be a nightmare for accessibility, especially
> > > regarding Neurodivergent people such as myself, people suffering from
> > > dyslexia, etc.
> >
> > I know how much it can suck to be a neurodivergent.
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a "desilxyc", too. However, if an obfuscated email address contains
> the word "dyslexic" I've got the choice, either to punch in 20 times 20
> variations of "desilxyc" or either to copy and paste one time
> "dyslexic". If an obfuscated email address is a JPEG, then it can be a
> nightmare. If it's ASCII, then there's no reason to suffer, at least not
> for a dyslexic.
>
> Regards,
> Ralf
PS: It's similar for blind people without three hands. If they type with
two hands, they can't do proofreading at the same time by the braille
display. A dyslexic can't do proofreading because parts of a text easily
can become just coloured bars and some characters are floating, changing
their positions. OTOH there is no issue with
"# Maintainer: Foo Bar <foo dot bar at mail dot com>"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
a series of so many short words is terribly
difficult for me to read, but I don't need to read it and try to
understand it like a sentence. I just need to copy and paste it and to
find the parts that need a replacement, without the need to understand
it like a sentence. At least for me it's not hard to find and replace
"dot", "at" and " ".
