Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yuuta Liang <yuuta@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
From: Rafael Fontenelle <rafaelff@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 22:23:01 -0300
Cc: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2636da25-68e3-2b53-b734-adc3a9f68817@yuuta.moe>

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:16 PM Yuuta Liang <yuuta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It seems like remmina -> vte3 -> gtk3 -> libsoup, so it is OK. Could you
> double check that?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Yuuta Liang
>

'pactree gtk3' shows that gtk3 -> tracker3 -> libsoup3. There is no
libsoup (v2) in the output of 'pactree remmina'.

Rafael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
  - From: u34

References:
- Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
  - From: u34
- Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
  - From: Damjan Georgievski
- Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
  - From: Mike Yuan
- Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
  - From: u34
- Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
  - From: Yuuta Liang

Prev by Date: Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
Next by Date: Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
Previous by thread: Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
Next by thread: Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]