On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 04:48:59AM -0500, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote: > As far as the rational "Arch used to pride itself in providing optimised > binaries out of the box.", I can't see compilation to v3 being more than an > immeasurable instruction or two different from a build for v2 in all but > rare packages. It's not like Arch is only used by a minority of users who > "may" benefit from new gcc11 introduced optimizations. The original RFC was to just up the baseline from v1 to v2, but this was rejected for a separate v3 port instead. See the discussion here, https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/2 -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
