On 06/05/22, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote: > On 05-05-2022 22:41, Javier via arch-general wrote: > > Today's thunderbird upgrade broke sequoia-octopus-librnp (universe), it > > might be octopus just requires a new build with up to date sys > > libraries, or that a new octopus librnp version is required. > > > > For now, keeping thunderbird on 91.8.1-1, not allowing it to upgrade is > > a workaround. > > > > from https://sequoia-pgp.org/ > > > Octopus 1.3.0 is Released > <https://sequoia-pgp.org/blog/2022/04/22/202204-octopus-1.3.0/> > > By Justus <https://sequoia-pgp.org/#> on April 22, 2022 > > We are pleased to announce a new release of the Octopus > <https://crates.io/crates/sequoia-octopus-librnp>, an alternative OpenPGP > backend for Thunderbird. This release notably fixes a bug that could lead to > a loss of secret key material. It also includes fixes that make the Octopus > compatible with Thunderbird 91.8.0. > > > Looks like that library will require a new version . > > I can't find sequoia-octopus-librnp in archlinux repos or aur, are you sure > arch-general ML is the right place to report this ? > > > Lone_Wolf There's no easy way to replace the PGP backend implementation in thunderbird at the moment. The ticket is still Open [1] in bugzilla and hopefully there's a config option added - then we can package the octopus librnp. That's the reason this is not packaged yet. Also I agree with Lone_wolf this doesn't seem like it's Arch Linux related as we don't have a 'universe' repo. [1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1698540 -- Leonidas Spyropoulos A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
