Re: Odd unicode glyph rendering issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2022-04-04T15:48:54 +0200
LuKaRo via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What about the list of installed packages? Are there any notable 
> differences? Maybe make a diff on the output of pacman -Q :)
> 

Nothing notable, in this case, however...

On 2022-04-04T15:59:29 +0100
Ralph Corderoy via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> > What about the list of installed packages? Are there any notable 
> > differences?  Maybe make a diff on the output of pacman -Q :)  
> 
> Also, compare the output of fc-list(1) on each machine?

It looks like this might be the culprit. I aggressively went through
the working machine and removed any font that wasn't present on the
non-working machine. Now, neither machine works!

So now the issue is that even though both machines have been configured
to use the same font all along, clearly the one that _was_ working was
falling back to some other font for the glyphs the selected font didn't
have.

I'm not sure if there's a sane way to find out what exactly was
happening there. Ideally I'd like both machines to work.

-- 
Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux