On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:00:28 -0500 David Rosenstrauch via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/13/21 2:30 PM, pete via arch-general wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:16:50 -0500 > > David Rosenstrauch via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote: > >>> The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an > >>> option to format with 64 bit timestamps but I seem to recall it being > >>> flakey somehow) > >> > >> The XFS bigtime features isn't at all flakey. (I've been using it for > >> months without any issue.) But it used to print out an "experimental" > >> feature warning. They removed that warning a few months ago, as the > >> feature had been merged in over a year ago and has had no major issues > >> reported. > >> > >> DR > > > > Ahhh there may be my problem > > > > I still gt the experimental warning every now and then have to try forced > > update of all XFS related progs > > You shouldn't be seeing the experimental warning any more if you're > running up to date kernels. It got removed around August. > (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg54740.html) > > DR Hi . Wonder why then because i update almost daily with " pacman -Syu" the only thing i am cautcious of is messa as it can cause problems in some programs for me . Pete