Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Lone_Wolf via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
From: Genes Lists via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 13:40:53 -0400
Arc-authentication-results: i=1; arc-srv6.sapience.com
Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sapience.com; s=arc6-190826; t=1621100453; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h9+bpLnZZOUmu33BmVz7rL6SUPeN4SbdsEKXQvTwQas=; h=DKIM-Signature:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Language; b=AWczsvJjeng25/CqDsbJBhJ3XHZxgkh+Ej3CWKo3R4z+ePtxlO1U1ZNH2qc4mAU3BeHJ8/wGYEpBvX0h13JdzreTHKBsQPUuWeTJkM18TeysVhYKUomxdyPOkfOD3BKAXpbXJdZT13bZFhGp9ym/An8N0zOnCQ1YFMYmXAy7V0VCQlqD3dC1EXk79Sj7zL4N/PVvY3YwzDulkB79Kf08kxhgprROFgqQM0Owe3e00+gJNm3YsEQVQza6+b+2QxSc3cm2VekkRCbWPDVRpLaY/qUqy4ZY1zQlWocp2lSfBF8vmEDjSB94QuX20+HawFY49xS8DVgCjydXW3XHqG6FFA==
Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sapience.com; s=arc6-190826; t=1621100453; cv=none; b=3VDl5wo/0QaeQiflrkCCZSuT2xTsC2mg1sJyEFk45gBJ9NunfKgFMrmbv5Tl4b9jcAR+ede5KMBxg2GT7VrvrwT9y7qzIshbrEtGHUS/BuE0vwHj8idwfe7hY+f7PHQNt+Kxb1jRSAUPmBrREUEuyNlIWHZFSBxDYNQtj9HN/e6lnOKRanzdQ+RUJeiDAkbnCBx/Xgxzel4pvBXxfZ+k/DnQn+L9oSRNgWjL5H22KpLNfGaif8TWDnbzKSgQvxCCPOPis7lLegm4cyg9ZTBJxoJF4SqPx8r0fE8r01pffC6M6hShmNjtfKq+nsajBHchFRDeDNCY+/WDgv07IpFd+w==
Cc: Genes Lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <d9d47a37-9315-125e-7390-4862055b66a3@klaas-de-kat.nl>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 5/15/21 6:33 AM, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:

> The following headers are used less widely in libstdc++ and may needto be included explicitly when compiled with GCC 11:
 > <limits> (for std::numeric_limits)
 > <memory> (for std::unique_ptr, std::shared_ptr etc.)
 > <utility> (for std::pair, std::tuple_size, std::index_sequence etc.)
 > <thread> (for members of namespace std::this_thread.)

Since the failure occurs in configure itself - does this suggest a bugwith autocoonf?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general

References:
- Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general
- Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
  - From: Lone_Wolf via arch-general
- Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
  - From: Lone_Wolf via arch-general

Prev by Date: Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
Next by Date: Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
Previous by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
Next by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 11 and new toolchain on [testing]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]