How I look at this I'd it's a lot like vim. We can either optimize to make things easier for newbies, or more efficient for experienced users. Based on context, it's easy to understand, and you're keeping things simpler by not coming up with myriad additional terms for related but slightly different concepts, with no benefit for the end user or developers. On Tue, Mar 16, 2021, 2:45 PM Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general < arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Em março 16, 2021 16:22 Matthias Bodenbinder via arch-general escreveu: > > Am Dienstag, dem 16.03.2021 um 19:03 +0100 schrieb Georg via arch- > > general: > >> Make a proposal at the relevant places or > >> leave it, but this topic has made enough noise on this list. > > > > > > Love it or leave it? I will leave it. > > > > So, what was the point behind all this bikeshedding if, at the first > criticism, you drop it? I told you to try and use the new RFC system to get > this moving. But, I'm telling you right now, Arch has way more difficult to > tackle issues than "what should the semantics on packages be". > > Regards, > Giancarlo Razzolini
