Re: Why move LTS to 5.10 when VirtualBox guests Kernel Panic with 5.10?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Em fevereiro 23, 2021 22:48 David C. Rankin via arch-general escreveu:

  I understood why it was done, I follow the kernel announcements, etc, but
was a bit bewildered by Arch moving LTS to 5.10 before Linux moved to 5.11.
Even today, we have:

linux 5.10.16.arch1-1

and

linux-lts 5.10.17-1

  So the LTS kernel is a release ahead of the Arch mainline kernel. It just
seemed like as a distro we would want to be a little more coordinated to
ensure both linux and linux-lts move in a coordinated way.

(sorry for the late reply here, no power for 6 Days 6 Hours due to Texas ice
storm... glaring example of all that is wrong with deregulated energy...)


You forgot [testing]. linux-lts became 5.10 after linux became 5.11 on [testing].
The fact that it didn't move to [core] yet is irrelevant. Holding back -lts would
not be ideal, just so we could release 5.11 and then move -lts to 5.10.

Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini

Attachment: pgpd4kze30rcG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux