Re: About package guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> I'm surprised that this is not respected by the trusted users when
> they pick an arbitrary package that is maintained in AUR and upload it
> to the community repository without crediting anyone of past
> maintainers. I saw this course of acting in several packages and don't
> like to me. It seems to me a total lack of respect towards the person
> or people who have been keeping the package so far.

It might be very possible, that the cases you mention don't need any credits, as 
those PKGBUILDs were probably written from scratch instead.

In fact I know of a case where a very trivial package of mine was adopted by a 
TU into community: https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/blob/
packages/libquotient/trunk/PKGBUILD[1]

That's me! :D

-- 
Sefa Eyeoglu
https://scrumplex.net[2] 


--------
[1] https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/blob/packages/
libquotient/trunk/PKGBUILD
[2] https://scrumplex.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux