On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 11:43, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 18:47, Giancarlo Razzolini > <grazzolini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Em dezembro 7, 2020 14:24 Emil Velikov escreveu: > > > > > > Doing GL (primus+bumblebee) as a start, trimmed only to the bare > > > minimum changes: > > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68882 > > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68883 > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Do you have details or a bug report about these? I haven't used intel > > > gvt-g and on the occasion of skimming through the code - quality was > > > below i915. > > > > > > > There is a nasty bug where nvidia prime render offload causes the VM to simply segfault [0]. > > But intel gvt-g is better than using virgl for 3D stuff on a VM. > > > If I have to choose - segfault or slower rendering (via virgl) - I'd > choose the latter :-P > Nevertheless added a few comments which should help you move forward. > > I would suggest opting for virgl, until all the relevant bugs are > fixed. This way we can proceed with the package cleanup quicker. > Is there any interest in the bugs opened, or the gvt regression is a must for those to move forward? My systems lack gvt support (nor do I have Windows license) to reproduce the bug(s), yet I'm willing to help to get this moving. Thanks Emil
