Re: netcl leaves network down until reenable performed - do we need note?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: netcl leaves network down until reenable performed - do we need note?
From: Łukasz Michalski <lm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:01:12 +0200
In-reply-to: <a0a94212-cb4a-b44a-c552-e33d2349ca2c@eckner.net>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 18/08/2020 07.29, Erich Eckner via arch-general wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> I got hit by this, too.
> 

Me too. Fortunately I was doing update on-site for a box without a BMC.

Regards,
Łukasz

References:
- netcl leaves network down until reenable performed - do we need note?
  - From: David C. Rankin
- Re: netcl leaves network down until reenable performed - do we need note?
  - From: Eli Schwartz via arch-general
- Re: netcl leaves network down until reenable performed - do we need note?
  - From: Erich Eckner via arch-general

Prev by Date: Re: netcl leaves network down until reenable performed - do we need note?
Next by Date: Re: AUR - Best Practices when Package no longer Supported for Linux upstream but LTS fine?
Previous by thread: Re: netcl leaves network down until reenable performed - do we need note?
Next by thread: Re: netcl leaves network down until reenable performed - do we need note?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux