> >> But to tell the users to discuss this upstream is bad advice. This is a >> situation where a distribution should take corrective action by >> reverting this configuration. This would add value and remove some >> useless code from the kernel. > No. If you want a distribution whose maintainers think it is a good > think to "correct" upstream decisions, you should use not Arch. > So there isn't a single package in Arch Linux which trusted users have changed them in order to fix an issue which they thought it's better this way? If there is/was a package what is/was it and why?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
