Re: NFS "updates"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 29/04/20, Markus Schaaf via arch-general wrote:
> Am 29.04.20 um 13:44 schrieb Andy Pieters:
> 
> > While it is relatively trivial to compile your own kernel with those
> > options enabled using Arch's build system, I think you'd better talk to the
> > actual people that made the change upstream.
> > 
> This change might have slipped through unnoticed. It seems idiotic:
> _Add_ code to the kernel, to break users systems, with no benefit
> whatsoever. It's clearly against Linus' agenda to not break userland.
> But to tell the users to discuss this upstream is bad advice. This is a
> situation where a distribution should take corrective action by
> reverting this configuration. This would add value and remove some
> useless code from the kernel.
> 
> BR

Might worth reaching out to linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list instead
of Archlinux as this is upstream default behaviour.

Cheers,

-- 
Leonidas Spyropoulos

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux