Re: Doubts with 'apulse'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Doubts with 'apulse'
From: Javier via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 21:35:17 -0600
Cc: Javier <j.e.vasquez.v@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAD8U+g-kDFf58L7qn4gfnHomYmfF99yK9XDSF3dFDeKuzvTEoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

Why do you need apulse to get firefox using alsa as backend?  Perhaps you can take a look at [3]

--
Javier 

[3]  https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox/Tweaks#Get_ALSA_working_back

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doubts with 'apulse'
  - From: riveravaldez via arch-general

References:
- Doubts with 'apulse'
  - From: riveravaldez via arch-general

Prev by Date: Doubts with 'apulse'
Next by Date: Re: Doubts with 'apulse'
Previous by thread: Doubts with 'apulse'
Next by thread: Re: Doubts with 'apulse'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux