On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:27:48 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:22:14 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>I suspect that paccheck's recursive option is unneeded. > >Doing a few tests, the quite option seems to have no impact either. > >paccheck --opt-depends > >or > >paccheck --opt-depends PACKAGE_NAME > >seems to provide the same output as > >paccheck --opt-depends --quiet --recursive > >*?* In the context without a PACKAGE_NAME ;), but I'm mistaken. The quite option does make a big difference, just the recursive option seems to be unimportant for the purpose. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ paccheck --opt-depends --quiet --recursive > /tmp/check_1.txt [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ paccheck --opt-depends --recursive> /tmp/check_2.txt [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ diff /tmp/check_1.txt /tmp/check_2.txt 0a1,30 > 2mandvd: all optional dependencies satisfied [...] [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ paccheck --opt-depends --quiet --recursive > /tmp/check_3.txt [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ paccheck --opt-depends --quiet > /tmp/check_4.txt [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ diff /tmp/check_3.txt /tmp/check_4.txt; echo $? 0
