On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:09:27AM -0800, Brett Cornwall via arch-general wrote: > Waybar [1] just had an update where it pulled in a project called "date" > [2]. I'm hesitant to package this under the name "date" since GNU coreutils > shares a binary with that name. But this isn't a totally obscure library. > > Should I persuade upstream to change the name? Should I package it under > another name? Or should I lay claim to the unused "date" package name and go > on with my life? "chrono-date" could maybe work as an alternative name? I'm unsure why this is in and not [arch-dev-public] :) -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
