Re: A few out of date packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wednesday, 12 February 2020 14:13:02 EET Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> On 2/12/20 3:27 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > Be aware that packagers might be busy, have limited time or various
> > rebuilds need to happen. For samba for example there is an updated
> > version in [testing]. For libelf, a rebuild is required which might make
> > sense to wait until binutils has support for debuginfod so we don't have
> > to rebuild it twice. [1]
> > 
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65406
> 
> Thanks for the comments Jelle
> 
> For libelf - very valid - and it's also not much out of date either.
> 
> The version of samba in testing is 4.11.2 and it has been there since
> last November and is now also behind current version (4.11.6).
> 
> Understand folks being busy for sure. In case of samba and refind-efi
> perhaps the packager could use some additional help?
> 
> thanks again!
> 
> gene

The issue with rEFInd is that after it merged zstd support for the Btrfs
driver, it doesn't build with TianoCore EDK2 libs (it works with GNU-EFI
libs). Unfortunately the rEFInd developer cannot reproduce the issue.
See https://sourceforge.net/p/refind/discussion/general/thread/0317e2e8/#6c20/f575/cecb

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux