Re: Adding a "posix" metapackage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Adding a "posix" metapackage
From: Neven Sajko via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 15:46:39 +0000
Cc: Neven Sajko <nsajko@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200104155651.2f36cbe8@utnubu>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Linux isn't POSIX, period!

I think Linux and its userspace (musl and glibc) try the hardest to be
POSIX. Don't they get the first implementations of new POSIX APIs,
compared to Darwin or the BSDs?

References:
- Re: Adding a "posix" metapackage
  - From: Ralph Corderoy
- Re: Adding a "posix" metapackage
  - From: Ralf Mardorf via arch-general

Prev by Date: Re: Adding a "posix" metapackage
Next by Date: Re: Adding a "posix" metapackage
Previous by thread: Re: Adding a "posix" metapackage
Next by thread: Re: Adding a "posix" metapackage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux