Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
From: Genes Lists via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 23:27:28 -0500
Arc-authentication-results: i=1; arc-srv6.sapience.com
Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sapience.com; s=arc6-190826; t=1572841649; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/f/OYEY0+w8+m2qeWmcSJew3Rgjb1b+6ZdFFfWMiIk8=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Language; b=pXzkRAzUMZjOIrnN75+5K0/HA6eUVlVFEr3va5c8zi1hxHkY520GH65jC1re+C3WEfTAxz71TPDuW57K/oo/je4JRMnm9oac6qb+dlL73vcOLf8nYrDBKQivuDmO7CczX3OrZ+sunCJVbjio1DJiCM+X3XFjOURCT6jN6cinwHOn/KKXJsStI4NYCSJC2BV+WnY5/9hnCPgu7vNwJBooqOAkOYlZeF7hP6rrpGKyzCpKw2DKnxohMs76x2v3LmYDTAHCY2uyAg13btTa0+KLHz219zqR0jqCLU07YHRyDyxb+BQ/Ep0A7JXC3Z0mKEKrPSbIDsdeqqbiMm4m67zNIg==
Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sapience.com; s=arc6-190826; t=1572841649; cv=none; b=he4GqxL7tkFzgjPnff+V8gAPeFX5xkeqJ89adpZ8pEHCc1vnc9IrT1Eb4qMRxdSjPpOJfQfwFS5gPv5FSuvuQvG1fh6MG2leMoZbbuXjvayIVFEfc/QG4bQNMU9SamucBczW+fmk+5b9FgNzXT86ZDcUZFS1QrY0FpNcvNX9ja76Wne+27RxIu2t7O7ldrbTG5hfAKFnIvFDKxx8j6WMYq7qAmQ/dsFtlRpQvz6qS9H+l+E/UhG2i+az5YjtpTlsCSTJTX3FPAnFXwI8rUNtOM6O4SNOuNNfpctYVAF5lQXbcdDYB+nBK0dNii1DbcCs8u5J1xf5d8XaGEZjsJOrIA==
Cc: Genes Lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <2862ac5d-d838-05d2-ef2e-da868354c9cf@sapience.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 11/3/19 11:16 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> 
> gene
> 
Clearly image size and compression both likely impact boot time.

An interesting comparison might be running systemd-analyze blame after
booting with and with hostonly and with and without compression.

Anyone have a comparison handy?

References:
- new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Damjan Georgievski via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Geo Kozey via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general
- Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general

Prev by Date: Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
Next by Date: Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
Previous by thread: Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
Next by thread: Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]