Re: new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 10/31/2019 01:30 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote:
> Em outubro 31, 2019 15:11 Geo Kozey escreveu:
>> 
>> What was the reason for not using kernel-install[1] standard instead of
>> all of those Arch's exclusive hooks again??
>> 
>> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/kernel-install.html
>> 
>> Yours sincerely
>> 
>> G. K.
>> 
> 
> There are several reasons for not using it. It's overly complex, it does a
> lot of assumptions for you, among other things. That doesn't mean it
> *can't* be used by the users. We are taking baby steps on making the
> booting process on Arch overall more flexible.
> 
> You can *right now* completely override the mkinitcpio hooks and, install
> and deal with the kernel *any* way you want. Want to not use /boot? Can do.
> Want to stuff everything on /efi? Can do. Want a hook that will build your
> efistub and update entries? Can do. This update opens up lots of
> possibilities, while also maintaining (some) backward compatibility.
> 

As long as my mdadm arrays continue to assemble and I don't end up with a dead
remote-supported box on reboot -- I'm all for it.

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux