Re: Recent logwatch update may need a news item?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi,

On 20/09/19 6:51 pm, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
On 9/19/19 8:29 PM, Amish via arch-general wrote:
Thanks but why would one parse logs to log it back to logs?
I'm not sure what this statement means, but there is no "parsing", and
the only "logs" are the systemd ones. Just emailing the logs doesn't
constitute re-logging it to a new log.

??? (read below)

The default behaviour of earlier version of logwatch was to send email
to root. (via cron)
The default behavior of earlier versions of the logwatch archlinux
package, yes. What about the default behavior of logwatch itself?

Also, like, the vast majority of system logs aren't automatically
emailed to root by the software itself. I guess the vast majority of
logs in a systemd-based distro aren't emailed at all (because unlike
cron, systemd does not do this by default).

Umm, I am not sure if you are using logwatch? It seems that you are not.

So I guess if the timer was meant to be drop in replacement for cron
then it should e-mail too.
Who said it was supposed to be a drop-in replacement for cron? The
impression I got from looking at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/56357
is that the timer was supposed to be a "migration from cron installs to
the upstream systemd service".

Only the maintainer would be able to tell what his intention was.

Because current upstream .service file is more or less useless. It parses the logs (journal) and sends the output (which is logwatch report) to systemd which in turn puts the logwatch report to journal! What is the point of sending log reports (back) to journal?

I will report to upstream to fix this soon, when I get time.

I really don't see why you think archlinux should be opinionated and
modify upstream service files. I hear your argument that the package
should have a post_upgrade message.

If something is buggy. That should be fixed. Ofcourse first attempt should be made to fix at upstream which I will do. But Logwatch has history of not releasing new version for long. (it took 2 and half years between 7.4.3 to 7.5.0)

So if logwatch does not fix service file for long then may be maintainer can look at it.

Regard,

Amish.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux