-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 16 May 2019, Andy Pieters wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:23 PM mike lojkovic via arch-general <
arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suggesting pacman add some portage style features for dependency resolution
and packaging? Modifying packages on a local system to fix bugs caused by
versions of packages?
Arch Linux has always made it clear that partial upgrades are unsupported.
I have had to do some hair-raising things to recover some systems after
doing partial upgrades, but this perhaps may make all of our lives a bit
easier. Even if their official stance on partial upgrades remains, it would
at least a more sane safeguard against ending up in a system that can only
be recovered by the guruest of gurus. (e.g. you upgraded glibc and nothing
works any more, or you've broken pacman,...)
Hi,
don't get me wrong, I'm not proposing to add versioned dependencies on
libraries to official arch packages, but to add the respective "provides"
entries, so _unofficial_ packages can have versioned dependencies if they
want.
What does "partial upgrade" mean in the context of a package compiled by
the user?
regards,
Erich
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=8QaE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
