On 2/19/19 4:19 PM, Tinu Weber wrote: > Author of remakepkg here. I think that adding such functionality to > pacman would be a bit... backwards. > > >> remakepkg invalidates .BUILDINFO and breaks reproducible builds as far as i can tell. > > The semantics of .BUILDINFO in the context of remakepkg were unclear to > me, so I chose to simply ignore it. Reproducible builds were not taken > into account, so it's indeed very likely that it breaks that. You could hotpatch it, but that's dirty. :P > In the end, remakepkg is a hack. But the underlying concept itself is > already a hack, so I'm not feeling too bad, to be honest :-) > > (that being said, I'm obviously open for discussing suggestions) I'm sure it's useful, but as you acknowledged yourself it's kinda unfit for pacman/makepkg inclusion. I don't have an issue with the tool itself as far as this discussion goes :) > > Best, > Tinu > -- Rob (coderobe) O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
